http://www.carbuyer.co.uk/tips-and-advice/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-my-carBefore the Euro NCAP car safety ratings were established in 1997, customers had to rely on a manufacturer's reputation and the safety features fitted to its models to know which were the safest cars. Euro NCAP has solved this problem by buying cars anonymously, and conducting independent tests on them to produce their car safety ratings. Almost 20 years on since the company carried out its first tests, a five-star result - which is awarded to the safest cars - is considered near mandatory for any new mass-market car sold in Europe.
Read more: Euro NCAP: How safe is my car? | Carbuyer http://www.carbuyer.co.uk/tips-and-advice/112490/euro-ncap-how-safe-my-car#ixzz4BONBIzGH
Follow us: @CarbuyerUK on Twitter | CarbuyerUK on Facebook
So they took the transducer readings on the dummies rather than what physically happened to the airbags. You assume level playing field between cars on how NCAP put together the scores. The first was the side barrier test to replicate a vehicle coming in from the side. That penalty was applied to a poll test which one assumes is hitting a side poll although deployment was fine. Thus they errored down the poll test even though that one was physically fine on deploynent and it was still rated as is. I don't think there is too much to get bothered about myself.In the side barrier test, the side curtain airbag did not deploy as intended and, while dummy readings were good, the score for the head was penalised and protection for this part of the body was rated as adequate. The same penalty was applied in the side pole test, even though the airbag deployed correctly. Protection of the head and the chest was rated as adequate and dummy readings indicated good protection of al other body regions.